Know the technology risk before the decision becomes expensive.
Independent technical due diligence for founders, boards, investors and leadership teams who need a clear view of platform risk, architecture, delivery capability, technical debt and scalability.
The decision this helps you make
Is the technology strong enough to support the commercial decision?
Understand whether the current platform, systems and integrations can support future plans.
Identify hidden fragility, maintainability issues, legacy constraints and delivery drag.
Assess team, process, suppliers, roadmap quality and whether execution risk is being managed.
Technology risk is easy to underestimate when the commercial story sounds strong.
Platforms can look stable from the outside. Roadmaps can look credible in a slide deck. Delivery teams can sound confident in meetings. But the risks that matter most are often buried in architecture, dependencies, technical debt, supplier reliance and delivery process.
Whether you are investing, acquiring, approving budget, rescuing a project or assessing a vendor, technology risk needs to be translated into business impact.
Technical due diligence gives leadership a clear view of what is real, what is fragile, and what needs attention before a major decision is made.
Architecture decisions hide future cost.
Shortcuts in systems, integrations or platform design can limit scale, resilience and future change.
Technical debt affects valuation and delivery.
Poor maintainability, weak documentation and fragile dependencies can become commercial risk.
Delivery confidence needs evidence.
A roadmap is only credible if the team, process, architecture and governance can support it.
A focused technical review for high-stakes decisions.
Get a structured, independent view of platform quality, delivery risk, architecture, scalability and the technical assumptions behind the decision.
Included in the package
Technical Due Diligence Review
An independent review that turns technical findings into a clear leadership-level risk view and decision recommendation.
Architecture and platform review
Assess system design, integrations, scalability, resilience, infrastructure, dependencies and platform constraints.
Technical debt and maintainability
Identify legacy risk, code quality concerns, documentation gaps, fragility and hidden operational cost.
Security and resilience view
Review security posture, access risk, data protection, resilience, backup, recovery and operational exposure.
Team and delivery capability
Assess roadmap credibility, delivery process, team structure, supplier reliance and execution risk.
Risk report and recommendation
A clear leadership report covering major risks, mitigations, decision conditions and next steps.
From technical complexity to leadership clarity.
The review is designed to turn complex technical findings into clear risk, impact and decision guidance for leadership teams.
Clarify the decision and risk lens
We identify the commercial decision, the technical assumptions behind it, and what level of confidence is needed.
Review platform, architecture and codebase
We assess structure, maintainability, scalability, dependencies, resilience, security and operational constraints.
Assess delivery capability and roadmap
We review team structure, supplier reliance, delivery process, roadmap credibility and execution risk.
Report risk, impact and recommendation
You receive a clear report covering risks, confidence level, remediation priorities and decision conditions.
A good fit before investment, acquisition, rebuild or major platform decision.
Good fit if…
Not the right fit if…
From technical uncertainty to decision confidence.
Commercial decision with unclear technical risk.
Independent technical risk view.
Due diligence from people who understand strategy, risk and build reality.
Cigma combines CTO-level technology leadership, CISO-level risk thinking and implementation experience. We do not just identify technical issues — we explain what they mean for the business decision.
Senior technical judgement
Architecture, platform and roadmap challenged properly.
Risk-aware
Security, resilience and operational exposure considered.
Commercially useful
Findings translated into business impact and next steps.
Independent
No vendor bias, no internal politics, no reassurance theatre.
Questions before you book.
No. It is useful for acquisitions and investment, but also for boards, founders and leadership teams making major platform, rebuild, vendor or product decisions.
Often yes, but the level of access depends on the scope. Some reviews focus on architecture, roadmap, team and delivery evidence; others include codebase and infrastructure review.
No. Security and resilience may be included in the review, but technical due diligence is broader than penetration testing. It looks at architecture, delivery, maintainability, scalability, risk and business impact.
Yes. Depending on findings, Cigma can support roadmap correction, vendor challenge, platform evaluation, technical leadership, remediation planning or delivery oversight.
Next step
Get an independent view before technology risk becomes commercial risk.
Book a short call. We’ll discuss the decision you are facing, the technical risk you need to understand, and whether a Technical Due Diligence Review is the right next step.
You will know